1. Mono vs OSC changes everything
- Mono camera: you need filters to make color — LRGB for broadband targets, narrowband
(Ha/OIII/SII) for emission nebulae. This is the main reason to go mono.
- OSC camera: color is built in. You don't need LRGB; you may add a dual/multi-band narrowband
filter to cut light pollution and boost nebulae in one shot.
2. Match to your sky
- Dark sky, broadband targets (galaxies): LRGB (mono) or no filter (OSC).
- Light-polluted sky, emission nebulae: narrowband is transformative — it rejects most light
pollution and isolates the gas. For OSC, a dual-band (Ha+OIII) filter is the high-impact buy.
3. Specs that matter
- Bandwidth (narrower rejects more light pollution/moon but passes less light, so it needs longer
exposures — most punishing on a slow scope; this is separate from the f-ratio effect below).
- Size/format (mounted vs unmounted; fits your filter wheel/drawer and avoids vignetting).
- f-ratio rating — fast scopes can shift narrowband band centers; check the filter is rated for
your f-ratio.
4. Sensible order to buy
- OSC in light pollution → a dual-band filter first.
- Mono → Ha first (huge impact, moon-tolerant), then OIII/SII, then LRGB.
Which set, and the trade-offs between them, is its own comparison — see
5. Budget tiers (confirm current models)
- Entry (OSC): one dual-band filter.
- Mid (mono): Ha + OIII + SII set, or LRGB + Ha.
---
What filters do: filters in astrophotography.